Triple
T24528704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C. simum |
E606738
|
entity |
| Predicate | foundInProtectedAreas |
P40017
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kruger National Park |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kruger National Park | Statement: [C. simum, foundInProtectedAreas, Kruger National Park]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: foundInProtectedAreas Context triple: [C. simum, foundInProtectedAreas, Kruger National Park]
-
A.
situatedInProtectedArea
chosen
Indicates that an entity is located within the boundaries of a designated protected area (such as a reserve, park, or conservation zone).
-
B.
locatedInProtectedEcoregion
Indicates that an entity is situated within a designated protected ecological region or conservation area.
-
C.
recognizedAsProtectedAreaIn
Indicates that an area is officially acknowledged or designated as a protected area within a specified jurisdiction, system, or context.
-
D.
countryProtectedAreaStatus
Indicates the legal or administrative protection status that a country assigns to a specific area or region.
-
E.
modernProtectedArea
Indicates that an area is designated and managed as a contemporary legally recognized protected area under modern conservation frameworks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4c90c848190b23c4303620dcaaf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b0ca8081908d931aec560eae56 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:25 a.m.