Triple
T2451734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harry Bright |
E53719
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToSophie |
P39941
|
FINISHED |
| Object | acts as a father figure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: acts as a father figure | Statement: [Harry Bright, relationshipToSophie, acts as a father figure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToSophie Context triple: [Harry Bright, relationshipToSophie, acts as a father figure]
-
A.
relationshipToLaurie
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Laurie.
-
B.
relationshipToAuntEller
Indicates the specific familial relationship that an entity has to Aunt Eller (e.g., whether and how they are related to her).
-
C.
relationshipToHumans
Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
-
D.
relationshipToMissWatson
Indicates the type or nature of a person's relational connection to Miss Watson (e.g., familial, social, or other defined relationship).
-
E.
relationshipToSocrates
Indicates the specific familial, social, or conceptual connection that one entity has to Socrates.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495d227c8190b26ae6548eeb1019 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd2bc7b5481908b3664495e99f1a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0aed2688190a18fe66b98d80e0b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd2baee308190bdaa41ef1f6bc9cc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.