Triple
T24491455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bonjol region |
E617650
|
entity |
| Predicate | presentDayAdministrativeContext |
P119114
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pasaman Regency |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pasaman Regency | Statement: [Bonjol region, presentDayAdministrativeContext, Pasaman Regency]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: presentDayAdministrativeContext Context triple: [Bonjol region, presentDayAdministrativeContext, Pasaman Regency]
-
A.
presentDayContext
Indicates that the relationship or action is situated in, or relevant to, the current time period or contemporary context.
-
B.
presentDayGeographicalContext
Indicates the current geographical setting or location in which an entity, event, or relationship exists or is situated.
-
C.
presentDayControl
Indicates that one entity currently holds authority, governance, or control over another entity in the present day.
-
D.
presentDayAdministrativeAreasInclude
chosen
Indicates that one present-day administrative area geographically or jurisdictionally contains another administrative area.
-
E.
presentDayAccess
Indicates that an entity currently has the ability or permission to access another entity or resource in the present day.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7f4e6bc8190aec540ae3b9ed7f2 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a9d912e88190bc39c05a9d7f407e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6a4580481908fddc385f5262f95 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:22 a.m.