Triple

T2449058
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Judicial Power of Colombia E53658 entity
Predicate canResolve P9755 FINISHED
Object disputes between individuals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputes between individuals | Statement: [Judicial Power of Colombia, canResolve, disputes between individuals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canResolve
Context triple: [Judicial Power of Colombia, canResolve, disputes between individuals]
  • A. canDetermine
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or authority to find out, establish, or decide the state, value, or outcome of another entity or situation.
  • B. resolvesOver
    Indicates that one entity successfully addresses, settles, or overcomes an issue, conflict, or obstacle involving another entity or context.
  • C. resolves chosen
    Indicates that one entity successfully finds a solution, answer, or outcome for a problem, conflict, or uncertainty involving another entity.
  • D. hasResolution
    Indicates that one entity possesses, specifies, or is associated with a particular level or type of resolution (such as detail, clarity, or granularity) in relation to another entity.
  • E. resolvedIn
    Indicates that an issue, conflict, or process is brought to a conclusion or solution within a specified context, medium, or timeframe.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab495d227c8190b26ae6548eeb1019 completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd2bc7b5481908b3664495e99f1a4 completed March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0aed2688190a18fe66b98d80e0b completed March 7, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.