Triple

T24489543
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject US Open women’s doubles champion E617603 entity
Predicate tieBreakRule P141055 FINISHED
Object standard tiebreak in sets LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standard tiebreak in sets | Statement: [US Open women’s doubles champion, tieBreakRule, standard tiebreak in sets]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tieBreakRule
Context triple: [US Open women’s doubles champion, tieBreakRule, standard tiebreak in sets]
  • A. tiebreaker
    Indicates that one entity serves as the deciding factor used to break a tie between two or more otherwise equal options or outcomes.
  • B. tieBreakerMetric
    Indicates a metric used to resolve ties when primary comparison criteria result in equal values.
  • C. useTiebreakers chosen
    Indicates that when primary criteria result in a tie, additional predefined rules or factors are applied to determine a winner or ordering.
  • D. tiebreakerGameLoser
    Indicates the player or team that lost a specific tiebreaker game used to resolve a tie in a competition or match.
  • E. usesHeadToHeadAsTiebreaker
    Indicates that a head-to-head comparison between entities is used to break a tie in their ranking or outcome.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7f4e6bc8190aec540ae3b9ed7f2 completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2a9d912e88190bc39c05a9d7f407e completed April 30, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6a4580481908fddc385f5262f95 completed April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:22 a.m.