Triple

T24477355
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Legislative Competence Order system E617267 entity
Predicate usedToAmend P156254 FINISHED
Object legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales | Statement: [Legislative Competence Order system, usedToAmend, legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedToAmend
Context triple: [Legislative Competence Order system, usedToAmend, legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales]
  • A. amendedFor
    Indicates that one entity has been modified or revised specifically to address, correct, or accommodate another entity.
  • B. soughtToAmend
    Indicates an attempt or effort by one party to change, modify, or revise something, such as a document, rule, or agreement.
  • C. mayAmend
    Indicates that one party has the authority or permission to modify, revise, or change something that already exists.
  • D. isAmendmentTo
    Indicates that one item formally modifies, revises, or adds to the content or terms of another item.
  • E. submitsAmendmentsTo
    Indicates that one party formally sends or presents amendments to another party for review, consideration, or approval.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7f3ae788190b683394db15f220e completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f29ed313a08190b745e89fe1c6cf55 completed April 30, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f287d76c7c81909494f12e606a9149 completed April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f28f4d978c81908310c01def2514cc completed April 29, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:21 a.m.