Triple
T24477198
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sea Fisheries Committees |
E617262
|
entity |
| Predicate | couldMake |
P5771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fisheries byelaws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fisheries byelaws | Statement: [Sea Fisheries Committees, couldMake, fisheries byelaws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: couldMake Context triple: [Sea Fisheries Committees, couldMake, fisheries byelaws]
-
A.
couldPass
Indicates that one entity had the ability or potential to move through, overcome, or be accepted by another entity or barrier.
-
B.
canMake
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to create, produce, or assemble another entity.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
couldConsider
Indicates that one entity has the potential or option to take another entity into account when making a decision, judgment, or evaluation.
-
E.
couldIssue
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to issue something (such as a document, command, or resource) to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7f3ae788190b683394db15f220e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f29ed313a08190b745e89fe1c6cf55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287d76c7c81909494f12e606a9149 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:21 a.m.