Triple
T24443615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Algonquins of Pikwakanagan First Nation |
E616335
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRightsRecognizedUnder |
P58382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canadian Constitution Act, 1982 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canadian Constitution Act, 1982 | Statement: [Algonquins of Pikwakanagan First Nation, hasRightsRecognizedUnder, Canadian Constitution Act, 1982]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRightsRecognizedUnder Context triple: [Algonquins of Pikwakanagan First Nation, hasRightsRecognizedUnder, Canadian Constitution Act, 1982]
-
A.
hasRightRecognizedIn
Indicates that an entity’s right is formally acknowledged or upheld within a specified context, system, or jurisdiction.
-
B.
rightsRecognizedIn
chosen
Indicates that certain rights are formally acknowledged or upheld within a specified context, such as a legal system, jurisdiction, or document.
-
C.
recognizedRight
Indicates that an agent formally acknowledges and accepts that another party possesses a specific right or entitlement.
-
D.
areRecognizedBy
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity as valid, known, or legitimate.
-
E.
hasRightsStatus
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular legal or usage rights condition or status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7edca608190aafefc8877a1b4da |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f29851e6cc8190a8f160cbed4e9ab0 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287d3237c819099559c00f83131d8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:17 a.m.