Triple
T24434071
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Douglas H. Cooper |
E616076
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnicGroupOfTroopsCommanded |
P47807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Choctaw |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Choctaw | Statement: [Douglas H. Cooper, ethnicGroupOfTroopsCommanded, Choctaw]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnicGroupOfTroopsCommanded Context triple: [Douglas H. Cooper, ethnicGroupOfTroopsCommanded, Choctaw]
-
A.
ethnicGroupOfUnitCommanded
Indicates that a military or organizational unit is commanded by someone belonging to a specified ethnic group.
-
B.
ethnicGroupOfCommand
chosen
Indicates that a particular ethnic group is associated with, or has control over, a specific command or military/organizational leadership structure.
-
C.
notableMilitaryUnit
Indicates that an entity is a military unit that holds particular significance, prominence, or recognition in some context.
-
D.
occupationForcesCommandedBy
Indicates that a particular occupation force is under the command or authority of a specified commander or commanding entity.
-
E.
troopsColloquiallyKnownAs
Indicates that a group of troops is commonly referred to by a particular informal or colloquial name.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7ec44b081909ccaf1f3bbec0641 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f297855fd08190904eedd2666d9622 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287d3237c819099559c00f83131d8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:16 a.m.