Triple
T24431486
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Collectors |
E616010
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableMemberClass |
P62791
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Collector General |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Collector General | Statement: [Collectors, notableMemberClass, Collector General]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableMemberClass Context triple: [Collectors, notableMemberClass, Collector General]
-
A.
notableClass
chosen
Indicates that an entity belongs to a particularly important, distinguished, or otherwise noteworthy class or category within a given classification system.
-
B.
notableMemberVariant
Indicates that an entity is a specific variant or version of a notable member within a group, class, or category.
-
C.
notableMemberWorld
Indicates that an entity is a particularly prominent or distinguished member within a global or worldwide group, organization, or context.
-
D.
hasNotableMember
Indicates that a group, organization, or collection includes at least one member who is distinguished or noteworthy in some significant way.
-
E.
notableTypeOf
Indicates that one entity is a particularly prominent, well-known, or exemplary instance or subtype of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7eadb248190a867130fe45f0388 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f29782a4a0819087cb7ba399371520 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287d3237c819099559c00f83131d8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:16 a.m.