Triple
T24417779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pineau des Charentes |
E615634
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalAgingContainer |
P155850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oak barrel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oak barrel | Statement: [Pineau des Charentes, typicalAgingContainer, oak barrel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAgingContainer Context triple: [Pineau des Charentes, typicalAgingContainer, oak barrel]
-
A.
typicalAgingIndication
Indicates that something serves as a sign or marker commonly associated with the normal process of aging.
-
B.
typicalAgingTime
Indicates the usual duration required for something to age or mature under normal conditions.
-
C.
typicalAgingPotentialRange
Indicates the usual range of time over which something is expected to age or mature under normal conditions.
-
D.
positionOnAging
Indicates a stance, opinion, or policy that an entity holds regarding aging or age-related issues.
-
E.
typicalAgingRequirement
Indicates that an entity is subject to the standard or customary aging process or minimum age condition typically required in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e9bfac8190a748952a90957106 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f29587b2308190907886b82d8c5129 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287cc4fd4819081e93cc638d9512d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f2915233c48190a181c8c1924e892c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:13 a.m.