Triple
T24403358
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Willoughby Run |
E615239
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedAsDefensivePositionBy |
P89170
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Union Army forces |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Union Army forces | Statement: [Willoughby Run, usedAsDefensivePositionBy, Union Army forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsDefensivePositionBy Context triple: [Willoughby Run, usedAsDefensivePositionBy, Union Army forces]
-
A.
hasDefensivePositions
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or controls locations, structures, or arrangements specifically organized for defense against potential threats or attacks.
-
B.
nearDefensivePositionsOf
Indicates that one entity is located in close proximity to the defensive positions or fortifications associated with another entity.
-
C.
defensiveStructure
Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a structure built or used to protect, defend, or fortify another entity or area.
-
D.
defenceUsed
Indicates that a particular defensive measure, tactic, or argument was employed in response to a threat, attack, or accusation.
-
E.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e780bc81908049c779e697a7f6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f294dcf7f4819094d2a3be163a5822 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287c4a2b48190b80fb7a3c0e9b018 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:05 a.m.