Triple
T24395344
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority |
E615012
|
entity |
| Predicate | separateOpinionType |
P156043
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concurring opinion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concurring opinion | Statement: [Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, separateOpinionType, concurring opinion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: separateOpinionType Context triple: [Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, separateOpinionType, concurring opinion]
-
A.
hasSeparateOpinions
Indicates that the related entities hold distinct or differing views, judgments, or beliefs about a subject.
-
B.
opinionBy
Indicates that a particular opinion, viewpoint, or judgment is expressed or held by a specific entity.
-
C.
pluralityOpinionBy
Indicates that the referenced opinion is the controlling or majority view issued by a decision-making body, as opposed to concurring or dissenting opinions.
-
D.
compiledOpinionsOf
Indicates that one entity has gathered, organized, or synthesized the opinions of another entity or group into a collective form.
-
E.
givesOpinionOn
Indicates that one entity expresses a view, judgment, or evaluation about another entity or subject.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e509b88190a53155d4f3de45ce |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f294d69b5c81908cf6143374934f5c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287c4a2b48190b80fb7a3c0e9b018 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f28f4d978c81908310c01def2514cc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:04 a.m.