Triple
T2438084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Buffalo Bills–New York Jets rivalry |
E53208
|
entity |
| Predicate | isAFLLegacyRivalry |
P39325
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Buffalo Bills–New York Jets rivalry, isAFLLegacyRivalry, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAFLLegacyRivalry Context triple: [Buffalo Bills–New York Jets rivalry, isAFLLegacyRivalry, true]
-
A.
hasHistoricRivalry
Indicates a long-standing, often competitive or adversarial relationship between two entities, typically rooted in significant past conflicts or repeated opposition.
-
B.
hasRivalryAspect
Indicates that there exists a competitive or adversarial relationship or dimension between entities.
-
C.
hasRivalrySeries
Indicates a recurring competitive relationship or series of contests held between two entities.
-
D.
hasRivalryEmotion
Indicates that one entity feels rivalry-based emotions, such as competitive tension or antagonistic comparison, toward another entity.
-
E.
hasLocalRivalry
Indicates that there is an ongoing competitive or adversarial relationship between entities that are geographically close or share the same local area.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495b6dac8190ac82661aa1452222 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abcebf7cac8190889e6890d72c256c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5ac11b081908ce6a506e81a742a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abcebe7dd08190b197a2a0e78787e3 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.