Triple

T24378981
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rajadhiraja I E614556 entity
Predicate successorAsCoRegent P155982 FINISHED
Object Rajendra II NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rajendra II | Statement: [Rajadhiraja I, successorAsCoRegent, Rajendra II]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorAsCoRegent
Context triple: [Rajadhiraja I, successorAsCoRegent, Rajendra II]
  • A. successorAsRegent
    Indicates that one entity assumes the role of regent following another, serving as their successor in that governing capacity.
  • B. successorAsCoRulerOf
    Indicates that one entity became the next co-ruler alongside another entity, following a previous co-ruler in a shared rulership position.
  • C. successorAsCoEmperor
    Indicates that one entity becomes the next co-emperor following another entity in a shared imperial rule.
  • D. successorAsDeFactoRuler
    Indicates that one entity becomes the next actual (though not necessarily officially recognized) ruler after another entity.
  • E. successorAsCrownPrince
    Indicates that one person becomes the next crown prince, directly succeeding another in that royal position.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7e362e481909e32fe4ef8269d4f completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f293da489c81909a7912b790be8b8a completed April 29, 2026, 11:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 completed April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f28f4d978c81908310c01def2514cc completed April 29, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:02 a.m.