Triple
T24378752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UCLA Gold |
E614551
|
entity |
| Predicate | isTeamColorFor |
P4834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | UCLA Bruins football team |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UCLA Bruins football team | Statement: [UCLA Gold, isTeamColorFor, UCLA Bruins football team]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTeamColorFor Context triple: [UCLA Gold, isTeamColorFor, UCLA Bruins football team]
-
A.
hasTeamColorContrast
Indicates that there is a sufficient visual contrast between the colors associated with a team and another relevant color set (such as opponents, background, or interface elements).
-
B.
teamColorContext
Indicates the contextual or situational association between a team and its designated color.
-
C.
teamColor
chosen
Indicates the association between a team and the color that represents or identifies it.
-
D.
teamColorOrIdentity
Indicates that a team is associated with a particular color or identifying attribute used to distinguish it from other teams.
-
E.
introducedTeamColor
Indicates that an entity is responsible for introducing or establishing a particular team color for a team or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e362e481909e32fe4ef8269d4f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f293da489c81909a7912b790be8b8a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:02 a.m.