Triple
T24372461
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Curzon |
E614372
|
entity |
| Predicate | isAssociatedWithPeerage |
P64418
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Peerage of the United Kingdom |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Peerage of the United Kingdom | Statement: [Curzon, isAssociatedWithPeerage, Peerage of the United Kingdom]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAssociatedWithPeerage Context triple: [Curzon, isAssociatedWithPeerage, Peerage of the United Kingdom]
-
A.
linkedToPeerage
chosen
Indicates that one entity has an established connection or association with a system of peerage or noble titles.
-
B.
hasPeerageType
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a specific category or rank of peerage (noble title).
-
C.
hasPeerageTitle
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a formal noble or aristocratic title within a peerage system.
-
D.
isNotPeerage
Indicates that the entity does not belong to any recognized peerage or noble rank within a hierarchical social or nobility system.
-
E.
typeOfPeerage
Indicates the specific rank or category within a system of peerage that a given title or noble status belongs to.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e1e010819098b95eb3f905943d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f293d462f88190bf95a83274d8a850 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:02 a.m.