Triple
T24370808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Waterford |
E614325
|
entity |
| Predicate | municipalAmalgamation |
P80558
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1995 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1995 | Statement: [New Waterford, municipalAmalgamation, 1995]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: municipalAmalgamation Context triple: [New Waterford, municipalAmalgamation, 1995]
-
A.
hasMunicipalConsolidationWith
chosen
Indicates that two or more municipalities have been officially merged or unified into a single administrative entity or structure.
-
B.
municipalityReform
Indicates a formal reorganization or restructuring of a municipality’s administrative boundaries, governance, or status.
-
C.
partOfAdministrativeDivisionReform
Indicates that an entity is involved in, or results from, a reorganization or restructuring of administrative divisions.
-
D.
formerMunicipalityOf
Indicates that an entity was previously an independent municipality that has since been merged into or replaced by the referenced municipality.
-
E.
formerMunicipalityDisestablished
Indicates that a municipality, which previously existed as an administrative unit, was officially dissolved or ceased to exist at a specific point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e1e010819098b95eb3f905943d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2938b95188190b8f7ee1098c6088a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:01 a.m.