Triple
T24369996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Argyll Forest Park |
E614303
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableLoch |
P59565
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Loch Eck |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Loch Eck | Statement: [Argyll Forest Park, hasNotableLoch, Loch Eck]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableLoch Context triple: [Argyll Forest Park, hasNotableLoch, Loch Eck]
-
A.
hasLoch
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or features a loch (lake or sea inlet) as part of its characteristics or composition.
-
B.
associatedLoch
Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular loch (lake or sea inlet), typically by location, relevance, or contextual relationship.
-
C.
hasLagoon
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a lagoon in relation to another entity or location.
-
D.
notableGorge
Indicates a relationship where a gorge is recognized as notable, significant, or of particular interest in some context.
-
E.
hasNotableLodge
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a lodge that is considered notable or significant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e1e010819098b95eb3f905943d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2938a4f188190932af66f57be0756 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:01 a.m.