Triple

T24368577
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pope Sergius III E614267 entity
Predicate allegedRelationshipWith P120587 FINISHED
Object Marozia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marozia | Statement: [Pope Sergius III, allegedRelationshipWith, Marozia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedRelationshipWith
Context triple: [Pope Sergius III, allegedRelationshipWith, Marozia]
  • A. hasAllegedRelationshipWith chosen
    Indicates a claimed or suspected relationship between two entities that is not confirmed as factual.
  • B. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • C. worksInCloseRelationshipWith
    Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
  • D. establishedRelationship
    Indicates that a formal, recognized relationship has been created and is now in effect between the referenced entities.
  • E. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7e1e010819098b95eb3f905943d completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2938994c081909730d1e02e823dfd completed April 29, 2026, 11:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 completed April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:01 a.m.