Triple
T24353446
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ivor Claire |
E613855
|
entity |
| Predicate | isUsedByAuthorToCritique |
P50924
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British military leadership |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British military leadership | Statement: [Ivor Claire, isUsedByAuthorToCritique, British military leadership]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isUsedByAuthorToCritique Context triple: [Ivor Claire, isUsedByAuthorToCritique, British military leadership]
-
A.
usedToCritique
chosen
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
-
B.
hasTargetOfCritique
Indicates that one entity is the object or focus of another entity’s criticism or evaluative critique.
-
C.
usedByAuthorTo
Indicates that something is employed or utilized by an author to achieve a particular purpose or effect.
-
D.
usedByAuthor
Indicates that something (such as a method, tool, or resource) is employed or utilized by an author.
-
E.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7ddd29481909e7f539a6072bd71 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2934732908190a50e69f492a5dc7a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:59 a.m.