Triple
T24353441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ivor Claire |
E613855
|
entity |
| Predicate | isJudgedAs |
P60486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dishonourable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dishonourable | Statement: [Ivor Claire, isJudgedAs, dishonourable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isJudgedAs Context triple: [Ivor Claire, isJudgedAs, dishonourable]
-
A.
judgedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity evaluates or forms an opinion about another entity according to some criteria or standard.
-
B.
judgedOn
Indicates that an entity is evaluated or assessed based on a specified criterion, standard, or aspect.
-
C.
judgedBy
Indicates that one entity evaluates, assesses, or forms an opinion about another entity, often in an official or critical capacity.
-
D.
judgeFrom
Indicates that one entity forms an opinion, evaluation, or conclusion about something based on another specified source, basis, or perspective.
-
E.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7ddd29481909e7f539a6072bd71 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2934732908190a50e69f492a5dc7a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287bb1b2c81909c2e7fcc392ad143 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:59 a.m.