Triple
T24346439
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1994 Stanley Cup playoffs |
E613653
|
entity |
| Predicate | finalsLosingCoach |
P21416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pat Quinn |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pat Quinn | Statement: [1994 Stanley Cup playoffs, finalsLosingCoach, Pat Quinn]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: finalsLosingCoach Context triple: [1994 Stanley Cup playoffs, finalsLosingCoach, Pat Quinn]
-
A.
hasLosingTeamCoach
chosen
Indicates that a particular game, match, or competition is associated with the coach of the team that lost.
-
B.
finalsLosingTeam
Indicates the team that was defeated in the final match of a competition or tournament.
-
C.
hasWinningCoach
Indicates that an entity (such as a team or athlete) is associated with the coach who led them to a victory or championship.
-
D.
finalsAppearanceAsHeadCoach
Indicates that a person, in their role as head coach, led a team to appear in a championship finals series or game.
-
E.
headCoachEnd
Indicates the point in time or event at which an entity’s role or tenure as a head coach comes to an end.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7ddd29481909e7f539a6072bd71 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2932978b88190afc441a3d4805e5f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287ad30048190b3ad3613486f277f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:58 a.m.