Triple
T2433907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Seven Bishops |
E52908
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForOpposition |
P24494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | belief that the Declaration of Indulgence was illegal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: belief that the Declaration of Indulgence was illegal | Statement: [Seven Bishops, reasonForOpposition, belief that the Declaration of Indulgence was illegal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForOpposition Context triple: [Seven Bishops, reasonForOpposition, belief that the Declaration of Indulgence was illegal]
-
A.
statedReason
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
-
B.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
C.
reasonForDecline
Indicates the explanation or cause given for why something was rejected, reduced, or not accepted.
-
D.
reasonForAppealDecision
Indicates the justification or grounds cited for making a particular appeal decision.
-
E.
reasonForAnnulment
Indicates the specific cause or grounds on which a prior decision, agreement, or status is formally annulled or declared invalid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4959bcc0819083246f9fb10439e3 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abcc74a5108190a3a9631b0cc1a127 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5aa1b60819081b87f7985c6cff3 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.