Triple
T24305451
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Delayed Exit of Claude and Eustace |
E612521
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipBetweenBertieAndEustace |
P73870
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cousins |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cousins | Statement: [The Delayed Exit of Claude and Eustace, relationshipBetweenBertieAndEustace, cousins]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipBetweenBertieAndEustace Context triple: [The Delayed Exit of Claude and Eustace, relationshipBetweenBertieAndEustace, cousins]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWithBertieWooster
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship an entity has with Bertie Wooster.
-
B.
relationshipToBertieWooster
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Bertie Wooster.
-
C.
viewsBertieWoosterAs
Indicates how one entity perceives or regards Bertie Wooster, characterizing their attitude, opinion, or mental image of him.
-
D.
relationshipToLordEmsworth
Indicates the specific social or familial relationship that an entity has to Lord Emsworth.
-
E.
relationshipWithEdmund
Indicates that there exists some form of relationship or connection involving the entity Edmund.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7d91bb48190bc5377d17a85fb21 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2922641bc81908fa3595941e60741 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c45c6ec081908401b69424428100 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:30 a.m.