Triple
T24305149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Sudan–Democratic Republic of the Congo border |
E612512
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerColonialPowers |
P130899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United Kingdom |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United Kingdom | Statement: [South Sudan–Democratic Republic of the Congo border, formerColonialPowers, United Kingdom]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerColonialPowers Context triple: [South Sudan–Democratic Republic of the Congo border, formerColonialPowers, United Kingdom]
-
A.
wasColonialPower
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
-
B.
colonialPowerAfter
Indicates that one entity became the colonial ruler of another entity after a specified time or event, succeeding a previous colonial authority.
-
C.
imperialPossessions
Indicates that one entity holds colonial or territorial control over another as part of its empire.
-
D.
colonialPowerInHistory
chosen
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control, dominance, or governance over another entity.
-
E.
colonialPowerBefore
Indicates that one entity served as the colonial ruling power over another entity during an earlier, preceding time period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7d91bb48190bc5377d17a85fb21 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2922641bc81908fa3595941e60741 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c45c6ec081908401b69424428100 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:30 a.m.