Triple
T24295724
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | National Bank Act |
E605951
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfSNB |
P155455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | independent central bank |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independent central bank | Statement: [National Bank Act, legalStatusOfSNB, independent central bank]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfSNB Context triple: [National Bank Act, legalStatusOfSNB, independent central bank]
-
A.
statusOfSwitzerland
Indicates the political or legal condition, classification, or standing that applies to Switzerland in a given context.
-
B.
legalStatusInBelgium
Indicates the legal status or standing that an entity holds within the jurisdiction of Belgium.
-
C.
isLegalTenderSince
Indicates that something has held the status of legal tender starting from a specified point in time.
-
D.
legalStatusRecognizedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status is officially acknowledged or valid within a specified jurisdiction or legal system.
-
E.
certificationSwitzerland
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a certification that is valid, issued, or recognized in Switzerland.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29549335881909cbf27adcaba1cf0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2915a00f08190a93a009ada096b69 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c45c6ec081908401b69424428100 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1c6d4e99081909f61899eccafb73e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:09 a.m.