Triple
T24294901
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asr |
E605929
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresPurity |
P42360
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Asr, requiresPurity, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresPurity Context triple: [Asr, requiresPurity, yes]
-
A.
purity
Indicates that an entity possesses a high degree of cleanliness, integrity, or freedom from contamination, corruption, or mixed elements.
-
B.
mutabilityRequirement
Indicates a requirement that the related entity or value be mutable (i.e., allowed or expected to change) in the context of the specified relationship or operation.
-
C.
requiresProperty
chosen
Indicates that one entity depends on another entity possessing a specific property or attribute in order for a condition, action, or relationship to hold.
-
D.
requiresUniformity
Indicates that one entity imposes a condition that another entity (or set of entities) must be consistent or identical in a specified aspect.
-
E.
requiresSpecificityFor
Indicates that one entity or condition must be defined or described with a higher level of detail or precision in order for another entity, action, or process to be valid or applicable.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29549335881909cbf27adcaba1cf0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f291593c0881908a6827f0d8899fe6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c45c6ec081908401b69424428100 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:09 a.m.