Triple

T24274963
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eastern Army E605381 entity
Predicate notableAllyDefectionFromWesternArmy P125830 FINISHED
Object Kobayakawa Hideaki NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kobayakawa Hideaki | Statement: [Eastern Army, notableAllyDefectionFromWesternArmy, Kobayakawa Hideaki]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableAllyDefectionFromWesternArmy
Context triple: [Eastern Army, notableAllyDefectionFromWesternArmy, Kobayakawa Hideaki]
  • A. notableAlly
    Indicates that one entity is recognized as a significant or distinguished ally of another entity.
  • B. notableHumanAlly chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a human who is a significant or noteworthy ally of another entity.
  • C. initiallyAlliedWith
    Indicates that two entities start out in a state of alliance or cooperation at the beginning of a specified period or scenario.
  • D. formerAllyOf
    Indicates that an entity was once an ally of another entity but that alliance has since ended.
  • E. notableCommanderOrAlly
    Indicates that an entity is a significant military leader or important ally associated with another entity, such as a person, group, or organization.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2954707dc8190915551eb114cfff6 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f28d5eb3108190bbcd9fe1c091c365 completed April 29, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1c457a2908190993824395b3c365d completed April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:07 a.m.