Triple
T24272584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nadia region (historical) |
E605320
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterAdminSuccessor |
P49035
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nadia district (British India) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nadia district (British India) | Statement: [Nadia region (historical), laterAdminSuccessor, Nadia district (British India)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterAdminSuccessor Context triple: [Nadia region (historical), laterAdminSuccessor, Nadia district (British India)]
-
A.
laterAdministrativeSuccessor
chosen
Indicates that one administrative entity succeeds another in governing authority or jurisdiction at a later time.
-
B.
regardsAsRightfulSuccessorOf
Indicates that one entity recognizes or treats another entity as the legitimate heir or next in line to assume a particular role, position, or status.
-
C.
becameSuccessorOf
Indicates that one entity took over the role, position, or function previously held by another entity.
-
D.
successorAsChief
Indicates that one entity becomes the next chief, taking over the leadership role from another entity.
-
E.
successorAsRegent
Indicates that one entity assumes the role of regent following another, serving as their successor in that governing capacity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2954707dc8190915551eb114cfff6 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f28d5ae9848190a622807e30319682 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c457a2908190993824395b3c365d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:07 a.m.