Triple

T24255460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hotepsekhemwy E603654 entity
Predicate hasRegnalStatus P66246 FINISHED
Object historically attested ruler LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historically attested ruler | Statement: [Hotepsekhemwy, hasRegnalStatus, historically attested ruler]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRegnalStatus
Context triple: [Hotepsekhemwy, hasRegnalStatus, historically attested ruler]
  • A. hasRoyalStatus
    Indicates that an entity possesses a recognized royal rank, title, or status within a monarchy or royal system.
  • B. reignStatus chosen
    Indicates the status or condition of an entity’s period of rule or governance, such as whether it is ongoing, completed, or otherwise characterized.
  • C. legalStatusOfMonarch
    Indicates the legal status or standing that a monarch holds within a given legal or constitutional framework.
  • D. hasCanonicalCoronationStatus
    Indicates that an entity has an officially recognized or standard status with respect to a coronation.
  • E. royalPrenomenStatus
    Indicates the formal status or role associated with a ruler’s royal prenomen (throne name) within a given context or system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e29540da0481909a38bdae315b7a02 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f28c6284dc8190a357f15d95b0360a completed April 29, 2026, 10:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1c450aa508190bc9d372a5f6ee47a completed April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:05 a.m.