Triple
T24250619
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kalmar län |
E603512
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalProvinceIncludes |
P36806
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Småland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Småland | Statement: [Kalmar län, historicalProvinceIncludes, Småland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalProvinceIncludes Context triple: [Kalmar län, historicalProvinceIncludes, Småland]
-
A.
locatedInProvinceHistorical
Indicates that an entity was situated within a specific province during a historical period or according to historical administrative boundaries.
-
B.
historicalProvinceGroup
Indicates that two or more provinces are grouped together based on sharing a common historical administrative or territorial affiliation.
-
C.
historicalRegionCorrespondsTo
chosen
Indicates that a historical region matches or aligns with a specific region, territory, or administrative unit in terms of location, extent, or identity.
-
D.
hasProvinceHistoricallyConfusedWith
Indicates that one province has historically been mistaken for or conflated with another province in records, maps, or common understanding.
-
E.
formerProvince
Indicates that an entity was previously a province of another entity but no longer holds that administrative status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29540da0481909a38bdae315b7a02 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f28b889798819086769788f188c9eb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c450aa508190bc9d372a5f6ee47a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:04 a.m.