Triple
T2424816
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jackson v. Georgia |
E53500
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliedAmendment |
P17936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments | Statement: [Jackson v. Georgia, appliedAmendment, Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliedAmendment Context triple: [Jackson v. Georgia, appliedAmendment, Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments]
-
A.
hasAmendments
Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
-
B.
typeOfAmendment
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of amendment that is being applied to something, such as a document, law, or agreement.
-
C.
amendmentRequires
Indicates that a particular amendment is necessary or must be applied in relation to another item, document, or condition.
-
D.
legalAmendment
Indicates a formal change or modification made to an existing law, regulation, or legal document.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495c44d48190b7235b23719bc3f6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc9f342e88190a430b02842ded418 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5a889948190b77de4ef6ac815a8 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.