Triple
T24244741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hertevin |
E603331
|
entity |
| Predicate | vernacularType |
P5302
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rural village vernacular |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rural village vernacular | Statement: [Hertevin, vernacularType, rural village vernacular]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vernacularType Context triple: [Hertevin, vernacularType, rural village vernacular]
-
A.
vernacularOf
Indicates that one language or dialect is the everyday, locally used form corresponding to another, more general or standard language.
-
B.
vernacularGroup
Indicates a relationship where entities are grouped or associated based on sharing the same vernacular (local or commonly spoken) language.
-
C.
linguisticType
chosen
Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
-
D.
linguisticVariant
Indicates that one linguistic form is an alternative version or expression of another within the same or closely related language context.
-
E.
vernacularLanguagePeriod
Indicates the time span during which a particular vernacular (locally spoken) language was in use or predominant in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953f631c819097cbb421046bd417 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f28b82e13c819083ca524e47ed66b1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c448abec8190b87cbf9ed419a309 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:04 a.m.