Triple
T24241649
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eurovision Song Contest 1966 |
E603242
|
entity |
| Predicate | conductorOfWinningSong |
P155313
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Johannes Fehring |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johannes Fehring | Statement: [Eurovision Song Contest 1966, conductorOfWinningSong, Johannes Fehring]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conductorOfWinningSong Context triple: [Eurovision Song Contest 1966, conductorOfWinningSong, Johannes Fehring]
-
A.
winningSong
Indicates that a song is the one that has won a particular contest, award, or competition.
-
B.
officialSongPerformer
Indicates that the subject is the performer officially designated as performing the specified song.
-
C.
winningPerformer
Indicates that the referenced performer is the one who achieved victory or first place in a particular competition, event, or contest.
-
D.
nominatedSong
Indicates that a particular song has been put forward as a candidate for an award, recognition, or similar honor.
-
E.
winnerComposer
Indicates that the subject is the composer who won a particular contest, award, or competitive event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953f631c819097cbb421046bd417 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f28aa04fe08190922d6abde695571a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c448abec8190b87cbf9ed419a309 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1c6d4e99081909f61899eccafb73e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:03 a.m.