Triple
T24235516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Order of the Coagula |
E601868
|
entity |
| Predicate | antagonizesCharacter |
P18963
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chris Washington |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chris Washington | Statement: [Order of the Coagula, antagonizesCharacter, Chris Washington]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: antagonizesCharacter Context triple: [Order of the Coagula, antagonizesCharacter, Chris Washington]
-
A.
antagonistOf
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
-
B.
antagonistStatus
Indicates that an entity holds an opposing or adversarial role, often acting as the main source of conflict relative to another entity or objective.
-
C.
hasAntagonisticProtagonist
Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
-
D.
antagonistActionOf
Indicates that one entity performs an action in opposition or hostility toward another entity, acting as its antagonist.
-
E.
antagonisticArc
Indicates a relationship in which one entity consistently opposes, harms, or works against another over the course of a conflict or storyline.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29538aafc8190a2386fdebbd1393b |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f28a9a4b708190851504c302778fd2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c448abec8190b87cbf9ed419a309 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 12:02 a.m.