Triple
T24223835
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gerrie Coetzee |
E601535
|
entity |
| Predicate | temporaryComebackYear |
P91011
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1993 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1993 | Statement: [Gerrie Coetzee, temporaryComebackYear, 1993]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: temporaryComebackYear Context triple: [Gerrie Coetzee, temporaryComebackYear, 1993]
-
A.
madeComeback
Indicates that an entity returned to a previous level of success, performance, or prominence after a period of decline, absence, or setback.
-
B.
revivalYear
chosen
Indicates the year in which something (such as a work, practice, or institution) was brought back into active use or renewed after a period of decline or inactivity.
-
C.
comebackWin
Indicates a victory achieved by overcoming a prior deficit or losing position during the contest or event.
-
D.
comebackAlbumFor
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
E.
attemptedComebackSeason
Indicates that an entity made an effort to return to a previous level of performance or prominence after a period of decline or absence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29537ca548190b94a37ebe1977caf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f287ddfecc81909f5396857974bc8c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c448abec8190b87cbf9ed419a309 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, midnight