Triple
T24212309
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wall of Denial |
E600584
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguagePrinting |
P155221
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Wall of Denial, hasLanguagePrinting, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguagePrinting Context triple: [Wall of Denial, hasLanguagePrinting, English]
-
A.
hasLanguageRepresentation
Indicates that an entity is expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular natural or formal language.
-
B.
hasLanguageOn
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
-
C.
hasLanguages
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
-
D.
hasLanguageStatus
Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its language use, recognition, or classification.
-
E.
hasLanguageType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular type or category of language (e.g., spoken, written, programming, sign).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953344c48190875730c7d52112a0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2820401bc81909ae1837b41c85526 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1c9834064819082024233d9c6f98f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:55 p.m.