Triple

T24212304
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wall of Denial E600584 entity
Predicate hasWatermark P8909 FINISHED
Object Esper NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Esper | Statement: [Wall of Denial, hasWatermark, Esper]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWatermark
Context triple: [Wall of Denial, hasWatermark, Esper]
  • A. hasWaterFunction
    Indicates that an entity performs, provides, or is associated with a specific function or role related to water.
  • B. hasWaterfall
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or features a waterfall associated with it.
  • C. hasHiddenImage chosen
    Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with an image that is not immediately visible or is intentionally concealed from normal view.
  • D. hasVignette
    Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a vignette (such as a brief scene, illustration, or decorative element).
  • E. hasTimbrality
    Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses or exhibits a particular quality or character of timbre (tone color or sound quality).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2953344c48190875730c7d52112a0 completed April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2820401bc81909ae1837b41c85526 completed April 29, 2026, 10:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c completed April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:55 p.m.