Triple
T24212282
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wall of Denial |
E600584
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConvertedManaCost |
P86133
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 | Statement: [Wall of Denial, hasConvertedManaCost, 3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConvertedManaCost Context triple: [Wall of Denial, hasConvertedManaCost, 3]
-
A.
hasManaCost
chosen
Indicates that an entity (such as a spell or ability) requires a specified amount of mana to be used or activated.
-
B.
hasColorIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific color-based characteristic or classification.
-
C.
hasLimitedMagic
Indicates that an entity possesses magical abilities that are restricted in scope, power, frequency, or conditions of use.
-
D.
canBeSummonedByPlayer
Indicates that the entity is capable of being brought into the game world or into action through a summoning action performed by a player.
-
E.
hasHeroPower
Indicates that one entity possesses or is endowed with a special ability or power characteristic of a hero in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953344c48190875730c7d52112a0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2820401bc81909ae1837b41c85526 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:55 p.m.