Triple
T24208187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trey Fanjoy |
E600456
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDirectedForArtist |
P146611
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Taylor Swift |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Taylor Swift | Statement: [Trey Fanjoy, hasDirectedForArtist, Taylor Swift]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDirectedForArtist Context triple: [Trey Fanjoy, hasDirectedForArtist, Taylor Swift]
-
A.
directedForArtist
chosen
Indicates that a work (such as a film, video, or performance) was directed specifically for or on behalf of a particular artist.
-
B.
hasDirectedActor
Indicates that an entity has served as the director of another entity, such as a film, play, or production.
-
C.
hasTargetedArtistFullName
Indicates that an entity is associated with the full name of the artist who is the target or subject of a given action or relationship.
-
D.
hasArtist
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or item) is associated with or created by a specific artist.
-
E.
hasArtistDirector
Indicates that one entity serves as the artist director (artistic leader or creative head) of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953344c48190875730c7d52112a0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f27ca7db848190952001ab2149ce62 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:52 p.m.