Triple
T24204231
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Attitude Adjustment |
E600058
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalRingName |
P155188
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FU |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FU | Statement: [Attitude Adjustment, originalRingName, FU]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalRingName Context triple: [Attitude Adjustment, originalRingName, FU]
-
A.
ringName
Indicates that a ring is identified or referred to by a specific name.
-
B.
hasRingName
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or designated by, a specific ring name.
-
C.
ringNameOf
Indicates that one entity is the name or designation assigned to a particular ring (such as a ring structure, ring system, or ring object).
-
D.
ringNameForOneRing
Indicates that a given name is the specific title or designation used for the One Ring.
-
E.
usedRingNameUntil
Indicates that an entity used a particular ring name as their professional or public identity up until a specified time or event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288ceaab88190899d0acb5931591d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f27ca38c148190ae65cd692567d43d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1c9834064819082024233d9c6f98f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:37 p.m.