Triple

T24168454
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sans contrefaçon E599059 entity
Predicate hasAndrogynousThemes P45364 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Sans contrefaçon, hasAndrogynousThemes, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAndrogynousThemes
Context triple: [Sans contrefaçon, hasAndrogynousThemes, true]
  • A. includesBothGenders
    Indicates that the referenced group, set, or category contains members of both male and female genders.
  • B. hasPersonalThemes
    Indicates that something (such as a work, message, or expression) involves themes that are personal, intimate, or directly related to an individual’s own experiences or inner life.
  • C. hasLGBTTheme chosen
    Indicates that the subject includes, features, or centrally involves lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender themes or issues.
  • D. hasNumberOfGenders
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many distinct genders are associated with or recognized for a given entity.
  • E. hasCrossDressingProtagonist
    Indicates that the main character in the work regularly dresses in clothing traditionally associated with another gender.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288cbd62881909de32ca64a70c17b completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f27c9ddfcc819096697a844b300cce completed April 29, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1c42f942c8190b103ff29a60fef34 completed April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:33 p.m.