Triple
T24157750
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anna Snegina |
E598734
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLyricalElements |
P104602
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Anna Snegina, hasLyricalElements, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLyricalElements Context triple: [Anna Snegina, hasLyricalElements, yes]
-
A.
hasLyricalForm
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical or poetic work) possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical structure or form.
-
B.
hasLyricalStyle
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
hasLyricalTheme
Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
-
D.
hasLyricsFeature
chosen
Indicates that something possesses a particular characteristic or attribute related to its lyrics.
-
E.
hasLyric
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288cb0a3081909ef221744f274384 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1e0e6d9fc8190a296f4f2b6d0d5e1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f176585f3481909beb907de252cd98 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:31 p.m.