Triple
T24152291
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rudolph of France |
E598568
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorAsDukeOfBurgundy |
P154797
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hugh the Black |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hugh the Black | Statement: [Rudolph of France, successorAsDukeOfBurgundy, Hugh the Black]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorAsDukeOfBurgundy Context triple: [Rudolph of France, successorAsDukeOfBurgundy, Hugh the Black]
-
A.
successorAsDukeOfBrittany
Indicates that one entity became the next Duke of Brittany following another entity in the line of succession.
-
B.
successorAsDukeOfAnjou
Indicates that one entity became the next holder of the title Duke of Anjou after another entity.
-
C.
successorAsDukeOfOrléans
Indicates that one entity became the next holder of the title Duke of Orléans after another entity.
-
D.
successorAsDuke
Indicates that one person directly follows another in holding the title and position of duke.
-
E.
successorAsDukeOfSavoy
Indicates that one entity became the next Duke of Savoy following another entity in the line of succession.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c9e488819093dd1acd91b08b8a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1e0e1e5748190bcc6681d409dcc05 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f176585f3481909beb907de252cd98 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1785afe3c81909be28986ffe944bf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:30 p.m.