Triple

T24148854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ISO/IEC 8859-13 E598468 entity
Predicate codePoints0to127 P70659 FINISHED
Object identical to ASCII LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: identical to ASCII | Statement: [ISO/IEC 8859-13, codePoints0to127, identical to ASCII]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: codePoints0to127
Context triple: [ISO/IEC 8859-13, codePoints0to127, identical to ASCII]
  • A. unicodeCodePoint
    Indicates that a character or symbol is associated with a specific Unicode code point value in the Unicode standard.
  • B. UnicodePlane
    Indicates that a Unicode code point belongs to a specific Unicode plane (a contiguous range of code points grouped by plane number).
  • C. definesCodepoint
    Indicates that one entity specifies or assigns the particular codepoint value used to represent another entity in an encoding system.
  • D. codePointType
    Indicates the classification or category assigned to a specific Unicode code point (such as letter, digit, punctuation, etc.).
  • E. usesCodePoints chosen
    Indicates that one entity represents, encodes, or operates using the specific set of Unicode code points defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c9e488819093dd1acd91b08b8a completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1e00d252c8190a02bec29189baad0 completed April 29, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f176585f3481909beb907de252cd98 completed April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:30 p.m.