Triple
T24145952
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neuß |
E598384
|
entity |
| Predicate | spellingReplacedBy |
P155008
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Neuss |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Neuss | Statement: [Neuß, spellingReplacedBy, Neuss]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spellingReplacedBy Context triple: [Neuß, spellingReplacedBy, Neuss]
-
A.
originalSpelling
Indicates that one entity provides the initial or historically first-used spelling form of another entity’s name or term.
-
B.
spellingStability
Indicates the degree to which the spelling of a word or term remains consistent over time or across different uses.
-
C.
spellingGimmick
Indicates a distinctive or unconventional way of spelling something used for effect or branding rather than standard orthography.
-
D.
spellingStatus
Indicates the correctness or condition of the spelling of a given text or term.
-
E.
sharesSpellingWith
Indicates that two entities have identical or substantially identical written forms (i.e., they are spelled the same way).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c9e488819093dd1acd91b08b8a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1e00b00708190bcd1d0b855230378 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1765650fc8190a6bc1eb512b240bf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f17c28b684819084eea522126463f8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:29 p.m.