Triple

T24129433
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mangyan languages E597901 entity
Predicate haveTraditionalSyllabicScripts P9809 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Mangyan languages, haveTraditionalSyllabicScripts, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: haveTraditionalSyllabicScripts
Context triple: [Mangyan languages, haveTraditionalSyllabicScripts, true]
  • A. hasSyllabary chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific syllabary writing system used to represent its language or notation.
  • B. hasSyllabicStructure
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific arrangement or pattern of syllables, such as their number, order, or type.
  • C. hasTraditionalDialect
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a traditional form or variety of a language or dialect.
  • D. hasTraditionalCharacter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or represented by a traditional (non-simplified or historically established) written character form.
  • E. hasOfficialWritingSystem
    Indicates that an entity (typically a language) is associated with a formally recognized and standardized writing system used for official or standard purposes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c808b881909fed7d18f04bcbbe completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1df7644808190b4bbbf4db1539f48 completed April 29, 2026, 10:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1765650fc8190a6bc1eb512b240bf completed April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:23 p.m.