Triple

T24123104
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ISO/IEC 8859-3 E597716 entity
Predicate usesParityBit P76800 FINISHED
Object no inherent parity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no inherent parity | Statement: [ISO/IEC 8859-3, usesParityBit, no inherent parity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesParityBit
Context triple: [ISO/IEC 8859-3, usesParityBit, no inherent parity]
  • A. hasParity
    Indicates that two entities share the same parity property (e.g., both even or both odd) with respect to a specified attribute or value.
  • B. parityBits chosen
    Indicates that there is an association between data and the parity bits used to detect or correct errors in that data.
  • C. requiresParityBetween
    Indicates that a balanced or matching condition must hold between two entities, such that their relevant attributes or quantities share the same parity or equivalence.
  • D. hasParityPatterns
    Indicates that there is a specific pattern or regularity in the parity (odd/even characteristics) associated with the related entities.
  • E. valueParity
    Indicates that two compared values share the same parity (both even or both odd), or more generally, how a value’s parity is characterized in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c808b881909fed7d18f04bcbbe completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1dee5937c819092396751c23553ca completed April 29, 2026, 10:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1765650fc8190a6bc1eb512b240bf completed April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:06 p.m.