Triple
T24113867
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paul Dinello |
E597450
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCollaborativeGroup |
P155107
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sedaris–Colbert–Dinello creative team |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sedaris–Colbert–Dinello creative team | Statement: [Paul Dinello, hasCollaborativeGroup, Sedaris–Colbert–Dinello creative team]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCollaborativeGroup Context triple: [Paul Dinello, hasCollaborativeGroup, Sedaris–Colbert–Dinello creative team]
-
A.
isCollaborative
Indicates that two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
-
B.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
-
C.
hasCommunityGroup
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or belongs to, a specific community group.
-
D.
containsCollaboration
Indicates that one entity includes or involves a collaborative relationship or joint activity with another entity.
-
E.
hasSocialGroup
Indicates that an entity belongs to, is associated with, or participates in a particular social group or community.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c74200819098ab875b592cb39f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1de1cf75c8190ad5352d4b290e735 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f17651458c8190bbfd301883e46085 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f17b58012c81909106b332db399023 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:03 p.m.